Camelot V3 Fee Calculator
Estimated Trading Costs
Key Features
- Zero Maker/Taker Fees: Both maker and taker fees are set at 0.00% on Camelot V3
- Dynamic Directional Fees: Pool owners set different fees depending on swap direction
- Low Gas Costs: Average gas fee on Arbitrum is approximately $0.001 per transaction
- Concentrated Liquidity: Higher capital efficiency for liquidity providers
Comparison Table
| Feature | Camelot V3 | Uniswap V3 | SushiSwap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supported Chains | Arbitrum only | Ethereum, Optimism, Arbitrum | Ethereum, BSC, Polygon |
| Maker/Taker Fees | 0% / 0% | 0.05% - 0.30% (pool-set) | 0.30% (standard) |
| Liquidity Model | Dual AMM + V3 concentrated liquidity | V3 concentrated liquidity only | Standard AMM |
| Dynamic Directional Fees | Yes, per pool direction | No, static fee per pool | No |
| Average Spread | ≈0.69% | ≈0.80% (varies) | ≈0.95% |
When you hear the name Camelot V3 is a decentralized exchange built exclusively for the Arbitrum Layer‑2 ecosystem, the first question is: does it actually solve the problems traders face on other DEXs? Below you’ll get a straight‑to‑the‑point rundown of its core tech, fee model, token ecosystem, and how it compares with the big players. No fluff, just the facts you need to decide whether to start swapping on Camelot today.
TL;DR - Quick Takeaways
- Zero‑fee maker and taker rates, average spread≈0.69%.
- Dual AMM supports regular tokens and stablecoins with dynamic directional fees.
- Concentrated liquidity (V3 system) lets LPs focus capital within price ranges.
- Only works on Arbitrum, so cross‑chain traders may need a bridge.
- Native GRAIL and xGRAIL tokens unlock farming, staking, and early launchpad access.
What Makes Camelot V3 Different?
The platform’s claim to fame is its Camelot V3 review focus on Arbitrum‑specific liquidity. While Uniswap and SushiSwap chase every chain under the sun, Camelot concentrates on gathering deep pools from Arbitrum projects via partnership incentives. This partner‑first approach creates a feedback loop: projects earn rewards for keeping liquidity on Camelot, and that liquidity stays stable because it isn’t constantly chased by the highest‑yield farms.
Technical wise, the exchange runs a dual AMM architecture. One AMM handles volatile tokens, the other handles stablecoins. Each pool can set separate “directional fees” - a higher fee when swapping from tokenA toB, and a lower fee the other way around. This dynamic fee model helps manage impermanent loss and aligns incentives with market demand.
Another key piece is the V3 liquidity system. Inspired by Uniswap V3, it lets liquidity providers (LPs) concentrate their capital inside a chosen price band, rather than spreading it across the entire curve. The result is up to 400% more capital efficiency, meaning LPs can earn higher fees with less capital at risk.
Fee Structure - Zero Fees, Not Zero Cost
According to FxVerify, both maker and taker fees sit at 0.00%. That sounds like a free lunch, but the real cost comes from the spread and the directional fee settings each pool owner chooses. The average bid‑ask spread on Camelot V3 hovers around 0.69%, which is competitive with other top DEXs. For high‑volume traders, that spread can be more significant than a nominal fee.
Because fees are set per‑pool, you might see a 0.15% fee on a low‑risk USDC/WETH pool and a 0.50% fee on a newer, volatile token pair. The flexibility lets project teams fine‑tune fees to cover gas subsidies on Arbitrum, incentivize early liquidity, or simply capture more protocol revenue.
In practice, users pay only the pool’s fee plus the underlying L2 gas cost, which on Arbitrum averages $0.001 per transaction - a fraction of Ethereum mainnet rates.
Token Ecosystem - GRAIL and xGRAIL
Camelot’s native token, GRAIL, serves three purposes: governance, fee rebates, and passive income. Holding GRAIL grants voting rights on protocol upgrades and fee‑distribution decisions.
The upgraded token, xGRAIL, is a staked version that unlocks higher farming yields, early access to launchpad projects, and boosted liquidity mining rewards. Stakers lock GRAIL for a predefined period, earn xGRAIL, and can later redeem it for the original token plus accrued benefits.
Price forecasts for GRAIL in 2025 are split. Some analysts predict a bearish outlook, while others see a potential range of $194‑$221 per token, driven by the growth of the Arbitrum ecosystem and Camelot’s expanding partner network.
Liquidity & Trading Volume - Numbers That Matter
At the time of writing, Camelot V3 lists 84 coins across 109 trading pairs, with a 24‑hour volume of $87.3million. The most active pair is USDC/WETH, moving $51.4million in a single day. Volume growth has been steady, up 18.78% over the past 24hours, placing the exchange in the 90th percentile for volume among comparable DEXs.
The platform’s average bid‑ask spread (0.69%) and combined order‑book metrics (74th percentile) indicate healthy market depth, especially for a Layer‑2‑only DEX. However, its organic traffic ranking (251st of 612 exchanges) shows there’s still room to grow brand awareness outside the Arbitrum community.
Pros and Cons - A Balanced View
- Pros
- Zero maker/taker fees keep trading costs low.
- Dynamic directional fees give pools flexibility to manage risk.
- Concentrated liquidity boosts capital efficiency for LPs.
- Strong integration with Arbitrum means cheap, fast L2 transactions.
- GRAIL/xGRAIL provide governance and extra yield opportunities.
- Cons
- Exclusively on Arbitrum - not ideal for multi‑chain traders.
- No regulatory licensing; users must perform their own due diligence.
- Documentation and community support are still maturing.
- Liquidity depends heavily on partner projects; a slowdown in Arbitrum growth could affect depth.
How Camelot V3 Stacks Up Against Uniswap and SushiSwap
| Feature | Camelot V3 | Uniswap (V3) | SushiSwap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supported Chains | Arbitrum only | Ethereum, Optimism, Arbitrum, others | Ethereum, BSC, Polygon, many L2s |
| Maker/Taker Fees | 0% / 0% | 0.05% - 0.30% (pool‑set) | 0.30% (standard) |
| Liquidity Model | Dual AMM + V3 concentrated liquidity | V3 concentrated liquidity only | Standard AMM |
| Dynamic Directional Fees | Yes, per pool direction | No, static fee per pool | No |
| Native Token Benefits | GRAIL governance, xGRAIL staking rewards | UNI governance, fee rebates for holders | SUSHI staking, yield farms |
| Average Spread | ≈0.69% | ≈0.80% (varies) | ≈0.95% |
What the table shows is that Camelot V3 offers the most fee‑friendly environment for Arbitrum traders, while the big names provide broader chain support but charge higher fees. If you’re already on Arbitrum, Camelot’s zero‑fee model and concentrated liquidity can translate into better net returns.
Getting Started - Step‑By‑Step Guide
- Set up an Arbitrum‑compatible wallet (MetaMask, Rainbow, or Coinbase Wallet). Connect the wallet to the Arbitrum network (RPC URL: https://arb1.arbitrum.io/rpc).
- Navigate to camelot.exchange. The site will auto‑detect your wallet.
- Deposit assets: you can bridge tokens from Ethereum to Arbitrum using the official Arbitrum Bridge or use an on‑ramps like Hop.
- Choose a pool: for beginners, the USDC/WETH pool offers deep liquidity and low slippage.
- Swap or provide liquidity. If adding liquidity, define your price range to concentrate capital - the UI lets you set lower and upper bounds.
- Earn GRAIL rewards by staking LP tokens in the farm section. For higher yields, stake GRAIL to receive xGRAIL.
Remember that concentrated liquidity requires monitoring. If the market moves out of your chosen range, your capital stops earning fees until you rebalance.
Risk Factors You Should Know
Because Camelot V3 is an unregulated protocol, there’s no insurance fund or recourse if a smart‑contract bug occurs. Conduct a code audit review - the platform’s contracts have been audited by reputable firms, but no audit can guarantee 100% safety.
The L2 nature means you’re exposed to Arbitrum’s security model. While Arbitrum has a solid track record, any layer‑2 compromise could affect all assets on Camelot.
Finally, the ecosystem lock‑in limits diversification. If you need to move assets across chains frequently, you’ll incur bridge fees and latency each time you leave Arbitrum.
Community, Support, and Documentation
Traffic data shows Camelot.exchange gets about 70,800 visits per month, with a 99% organic share. The bounce rate sits at 49%, indicating many users leave after a quick glance. The platform provides a basic help center, but deep technical guides (e.g., how concentrated liquidity works) are sparse. Community channels - Discord and Telegram - have modest activity; you’ll likely need to rely on the official docs and community FAQs for troubleshooting.
Future Outlook - Will Camelot Survive the Competition?
The platform’s fate is tightly linked to Arbitrum’s growth. As more DeFi projects launch on Arbitrum, Camelot’s partner‑first model could snowball, attracting deeper pools and higher trading volume. On the other hand, if cross‑chain DEXs improve L2‑to‑L2 bridges, traders may drift back to more versatile platforms.
Upcoming roadmap items include a governance voting portal for GRAIL holders, new launchpad integrations, and potential support for additional L2s like Optimism. If the team can broaden chain support without diluting the fee advantage, Camelot could move from a niche Arbitrum DEX to a broader L2 powerhouse.
Bottom Line - Should You Use Camelot V3?
If you already operate on Arbitrum, enjoy low‑cost swaps, and are comfortable managing concentrated liquidity, Camelot V3 is a solid choice. Its zero‑fee policy, dynamic fee settings, and rewarding GRAIL ecosystem give you a competitive edge over generic DEXs.
However, if you need multi‑chain access, prefer a platform with extensive tutorials, or want regulatory safeguards, you might stick with Uniswap or SushiSwap and use a bridge for occasional Arbitrum trades.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Camelot V3 really free to trade?
Yes, the protocol sets both maker and taker fees to 0%. You still pay the Arbitrum gas fee and the pool’s directional fee, which averages around 0.69% spread.
Do I need to hold GRAIL to trade on Camelot?
No. GRAIL is optional. You can trade any supported token without holding GRAIL, but staking GRAIL (to get xGRAIL) grants higher farming yields and governance rights.
Can I use Camelot V3 on Ethereum mainnet?
No. Camelot V3 is deployed only on the Arbitrum Layer‑2 network. To trade, you must bridge assets to Arbitrum first.
How does the dual AMM improve my trading?
The dual AMM separates volatile token pairs from stablecoin pairs, allowing each pool to set fees that reflect its risk profile. Stablecoin pools can keep fees ultra‑low, while volatile pools can charge higher directional fees to protect LPs.
What are the main security concerns?
Being an unregulated smart‑contract platform, risk comes from potential bugs or exploits. While Camelot’s contracts have undergone audits, there is no insurance fund. Users should only allocate capital they can afford to lose and keep an eye on contract updates.
Post Comments (20)
I love how Camelot V3 removes maker/taker fees. It makes trading feel more inclusive. The low gas fees on Arbitrum are a nice touch.
OMG this looks cool 😍! ZERO fees?? I’m kinda excited to try it out on Arbitrum, hope it’s smooth.
Zero fees are a game changer! Looking forward to lower spreads.
I think it’s a solid step forward, especially with the dynamic directional fees – kinda clever. Might be a good fit for stablecoin pairs.
Sure they say the gas is cheap, but you never know what hidden costs are lurking behind the scenes. Check the contract code before you trust it.
Zero maker/taker fees? That’s bold, but the platform still needs deep liquidity to stay competitive.
For newcomers, the fee‑free model lowers the entry barrier, but remember to manage slippage when using concentrated liquidity.
In the grand theatre of DeFi, Camelot V3 steps onto the stage with no fees, yet the audience must still reckon with the unseen choreography of gas and spread. It invites us to question whether costlessness truly liberates or merely reshapes the dance.
Camelot V3 arrives on the DeFi stage like a flamboyant herald, waving a banner that shouts “no fees” to every wandering trader. The allure of 0% maker and taker fees instantly grabs attention, especially for those who have grown weary of the tiny drips that silently erode profits. Yet beneath that glittering surface lies a sophisticated architecture that marries a dual AMM model with V3‑style concentrated liquidity. This hybrid design promises higher capital efficiency, allowing liquidity providers to allocate thin slices of price ranges with surgical precision. In practice, that means you can deploy less capital to achieve the same depth of market, a boon for smaller LPs looking to compete. On the flip side, the directional fee mechanism injects a dynamic element, letting pool owners tweak fees based on swap direction. Such flexibility can protect pools from imbalanced trading flows, but it also requires traders to stay vigilant about fee settings. The platform’s exclusive presence on Arbitrum further reduces gas expenses, with typical fees hovering around a mere $0.001 per transaction. For high‑frequency traders, that reduction translates into tangible cost savings that compound over thousands of swaps. However, the trade‑off is a narrower ecosystem compared to multi‑chain rivals like Uniswap V3, which spans Ethereum, Optimism, and more. The comparison table in the review neatly highlights Camelot’s average spread of roughly 0.69%, edging out SushiSwap but still trailing Uniswap’s tighter rates. In volatile markets, that spread differential can become the deciding factor between profit and loss on sizable positions. Moreover, the absence of explicit fees does not eradicate all hidden costs; slippage, price impact, and strategic fee adjustments remain ever‑present. Savvy users will therefore complement the fee‑free promise with rigorous monitoring of pool health and liquidity depth. Overall, Camelot V3 offers a refreshing experiment in fee architecture, pushing the boundaries of what a decentralized exchange can deliver. Whether it sustains its competitive edge will depend on community adoption, LP incentives, and the ever‑evolving landscape of Layer‑2 solutions.
Zero fees? Yeah, because every exchange is just a charity these days. Let’s see how long that lasts before they sneak something in.
The comparison table nicely highlights where Camelot V3 stands against Uniswap V3 and SushiSwap. It’s clear that the zero‑fee structure is its main selling point.
I can already hear the whispers of the crowd, the hype building like a storm over Arbitrum, as Camelot V3 promises a fee‑free paradise. Will it deliver or will the clouds part and reveal hidden costs?
From a technical perspective, the dual AMM design on Camelot V3 aims to improve capital efficiency, but users should monitor the pool’s directional fee settings to avoid unexpected costs.
The low gas fee on Arbitrum makes frequent swaps feel almost frictionless, which is great for active traders. I’m excited to see more liquidity providers join the platform.
The zero‑fee model is a double‑edged sword-while it removes explicit costs, it could incentivize front‑running bots to exploit the reduced friction environment.
If you’re looking to cut down on transaction costs, Camelot V3’s fee structure is a solid option-just keep an eye on spread variance across different pools!
Great breakdown! 😊 The directional fees give pool owners flexibility, but remember to check the fee tier before swapping.
I agree, the zero‑fee advantage is appealing, yet the average spread of ~0.69% still matters for larger trades.
Clint, that was a vivid analogy-your description really captures the nuance of fee dynamics in DeFi. Thanks for painting such a clear picture.
Sounds like another hype train to me.