BRUSH Token Burn Calculator
Paintswap's BRUSH token uses a deflationary model where 1.25% of each NFT sale is automatically bought back and burned. Use this calculator to see how many tokens could be removed from circulation based on different sale values.
Burn Impact Analysis
Enter values and click "Calculate Burn Impact" to see results.
Paintswap is the name you’ll hear when exploring Sonic’s NFT ecosystem, but what exactly does it do and why does its BRUSH token matter? This guide breaks down the token’s purpose, the marketplace’s features, how it ties into gaming, and where you can actually get your hands on some BRUSH.
TL;DR
- Paintswap is a deflationary NFT marketplace built on the Sonic blockchain.
- BRUSH is the native utility token used for fees, governance, and rewards.
- The platform integrates a launchpad, gaming hub (Estfor Kingdom), AI tools (PAIGE), and a random number service (PaintswapVRF).
- 50% of marketplace fees fund buy‑back and burn, reducing BRUSH supply over time.
- You can buy BRUSH on KuCoin, Bitget, or via DEX swaps using wrapped Sonic ($wS).
What is Paintswap?
When building web3 applications, Paintswap is a decentralized NFT marketplace and protocol suite that runs on the Sonic blockchain (formerly Fantom). Launched in mid‑2021, it started as a simple art‑trading hub and has grown into Sonic’s primary infrastructure for NFTs, GameFi, and DeFi services. The platform lets creators mint, list, and trade NFTs without relying on any central authority. Every transaction settles in wrapped Sonic (wS the ERC‑20 wrapper for Sonic’s native token, used to pay gas on the network), keeping fees low and confirmation times under a second.
Understanding the BRUSH Token
The BRUSH token is the native utility token of Paintswap, designed to be deflationary. Every time an NFT sells, 2.5% of the sale price is taken as a marketplace fee; half of that fee (1.25%) is automatically used to buy back and burn BRUSH, shrinking the circulating supply. Besides fee payments, BRUSH powers governance votes, rewards creators, and fuels in‑game economies like Estfor Kingdom a fully on‑chain play‑to‑earn MMORPG where BRUSH serves as the in‑game currency. As of October2025, market data shows BRUSH hovering around $0.009‑$0.011, with daily volume under $25k, reflecting its niche but active community.
Key Features that Separate Paintswap from the Pack
- Integrated Launchpad: Creators can launch new collections directly from the marketplace, bypassing separate fund‑raising platforms.
- Financial NFTs (fNFTs): Beyond art, Paintswap supports tokenized financial assets that can be lent, borrowed, or used as collateral.
- Bulk Minting & Interactive NFTs: Large‑scale projects can mint thousands of tokens in a single transaction, and developers can embed on‑chain interactivity.
- AI‑Powered Game Engine (PAIGE): PAIGE is an AI‑driven SDK that helps developers embed game logic directly into NFTs, opening doors for dynamic, player‑owned experiences.
- Verifiable Randomness (PaintswapVRF): PaintswapVRF provides cryptographically secure random numbers for loot‑box drops, gambling dApps, and on‑chain games, eliminating trust issues.
- Airdrop Marketplace: The platform runs Sonic’s official 190M‑token airdrop hub, letting users claim and trade airdrop allocations in a transparent market.
How Paintswap and BRUSH Fit Into Gaming
The most visible gaming link is Estfor Kingdom a massive multiplayer online RPG built entirely on Sonic, where every weapon, skin, or land parcel is an NFT. Players earn BRUSH by completing quests, battling monsters, or farming resources. Because BRUSH is deflationary, game‑generated tokens are gradually burned when players spend them on the marketplace, creating a self‑reinforcing loop that can boost token scarcity.
Acquiring BRUSH: Where and How
For newcomers, the easiest route is a centralized exchange (CEX). Both KuCoin and Bitget list BRUSH/USDT pairs, allowing fiat‑to‑crypto onboarding after KYC verification. After purchasing, transfer the tokens to a Web3 wallet (Metamask, Trust Wallet, etc.) that supports the Sonic network.
If you prefer decentralized routes, swap any Sonic‑compatible token (e.g., $wS, USDT, ETH) on a DEX like SushiSwap on Sonic. Remember to keep a small amount of $wS for gas and set slippage tolerance around 1‑2% due to the token’s thin liquidity.
Price Outlook and Risk Profile
Forecasts from LiteFinance, TradingBeasts, and WalletInvestor converge on an optimistic mid‑2029 range of $0.015‑$0.019 per BRUSH, assuming continued growth in Sonic’s user base. However, all models flag high volatility and the dependency on Sonic’s broader adoption. Investors should treat BRUSH as a high‑risk, high‑potential play, diversifying with more established assets.
Paintswap vs. Other NFT Marketplaces
| Marketplace | Blockchain | Fee % (seller) | Avg Tx Speed | Unique Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paintswap | Sonic (EVM‑compatible) | 2.5 (1.25 burned) | <1sec | Launchpad, fNFT, PAIGE AI, VRF, Airdrop hub |
| OpenSea | Ethereum / Polygon | 2.5 (no burn) | ~30sec (Ethereum) | Massive collection variety, fiat on‑ramp |
| Magic Eden | Solana | 2.0 | ~400ms | Low fees, Solana NFT tooling |
| X2Y2 | Ethereum / Layer‑2 | 1.0 (maker‑taker) | ~15sec (L2) | Order‑flow optimization, gas refunds |
Paintswap’s biggest edge is its deep integration with Sonic‑based gaming and DeFi, plus the built‑in token‑burn mechanism that directly benefits BRUSH holders. Its downside is a smaller user pool compared to Ethereum’s OpenSea, meaning fewer high‑profile drops and lower overall liquidity.
Future Roadmap and Development Outlook
Development remains active. Recent milestones include the release of PAIGE AI tools, upgrades to the PaintswapVRF service, and expansion of the Estfor Kingdom economy. The roadmap hints at cross‑chain bridges, further DeFi integrations, and richer DAO governance features, though no firm dates have been announced. Success will hinge on Sonic’s traction and the broader NFT/gaming market’s health.
Frequently Asked Questions
What can I do with BRUSH besides paying marketplace fees?
BRUSH serves as governance voting power, rewards creators on successful drops, and acts as the in‑game currency for Estfor Kingdom. It can also be staked in select Sonic‑based DeFi pools to earn yield.
How does the buy‑back and burn mechanism affect token price?
Every NFT sale contributes 1.25% of the value to a treasury that automatically purchases BRUSH on the open market and sends it to an irretrievable burn address. This reduces circulating supply, which can create upward price pressure if demand stays steady or grows.
Do I need Sonic’s native token to trade on Paintswap?
Transactions are settled in wrapped Sonic ($wS), so you’ll need a small amount of $wS for gas. You can acquire $wS on any Sonic‑compatible DEX or bridge it from other EVM chains.
Is Paintswap safe for new creators?
The platform is open‑source, and its smart contracts have undergone multiple audits. New creators should start with a small mint, test the fee structure, and read the community guides on the official Discord.
Can I trade NFTs from other blockchains on Paintswap?
Currently Paintswap only supports NFTs minted on Sonic. Cross‑chain bridges are planned but not yet live, so assets from Ethereum, Solana, or Polygon must be moved to Sonic first.
Whether you’re a collector eyeing the next art drop, a gamer wanting to earn BRUSH in Estfor Kingdom, or a developer looking to plug into an open‑source NFT API, Paintswap offers a unique blend of low‑cost trading, built‑in tokenomics, and gaming‑first features that set it apart from the crowded NFT marketplace space.
Post Comments (25)
Oh great, another token that burns itself like a candle in a rainy storm.
Well, the math checks out, but the hype feels overcooked. Still, the burn mechanism could curb oversupply.
Listen up, folks – the whole “deflationary” buzz is just a flashy marketing stunt.
They brag about a 1.25% burn, but that’s peanuts compared to the massive token dumps they pull behind the scenes.
Every time an NFT sells, a sliver of BRUSH disappears, yet the treasury gets fatter.
It’s like watching a hamster run on a wheel made of gold – impressive but pointless.
Bottom line: don’t get mesmerized by the burn calculator; look at the actual tokenomics.
The burn mechanism is straightforward: 1.25% of each sale is automatically bought back and burned.
This helps reduce supply over time, potentially supporting price stability.
Nice breakdown! It’s encouraging to see a token that actively works to limit its own inflation.
From a liquidity standpoint, the auto‑burn is a form of passive scarcity engineering, which can augment token velocity metrics.
However, market participants should monitor the burn‑to‑trade ratio to avoid over‑deflationary pressure that might stifle trading volume.
The philosophical implication of a self‑destructing token is fascinating – it mirrors entropy in a digital economy.
Every transaction nudges the system toward a leaner equilibrium.
While some may view this as a gimmick, it actually aligns incentives between creators and holders.
In the long run, such mechanisms could redefine value perception in NFT marketplaces.
Exactly, the calculator shows how even modest sales can shave off millions of BRUSH over time. 😊
Just keep an eye on the total supply to see the cumulative effect.
Looks fine but I have doubts about real impact
Burn rate seems low yet it’s marketed heavily
Honestly, the burn percentage is laughably small – it won’t move the needle.
The whole “deflationary” label is just a buzzword to lure investors.
Don’t be fooled by the fancy calculator.
Great tool! It makes the tokenomics much clearer for newcomers.
For anyone still wondering, the burn is real, but the token’s real power lies in its national adoption potential.
Don’t underestimate its strategic importance.
just checking out the numbers i feel the burn is a nice touch but we’ll see how it plays out over time
The concept is as vivid as a sunrise over a neon‑lit skyline, painting a picture where scarcity is woven into each transaction.
Yet, one must ask whether the aesthetic allure translates into tangible value for holders.
In practice, the burn adds a subtle layer of discipline, nudging the market toward equilibrium.
It’s a delicate dance of supply and demand, choreographed by code.
When I first encountered Paintswap’s BRUSH token, my intuition told me that introducing a burn mechanism could be a double‑edged sword, simultaneously curbing inflation while potentially hampering liquidity.
Yet, as I delved deeper into the whitepaper, the nuances began to surface, revealing a carefully calibrated 1.25% burn rate that, on the surface, appears modest but, when aggregated across the platform’s bustling NFT marketplace, can amount to a substantial token sink over time.
Consider the sheer volume of daily transactions – a vibrant ecosystem where artists, collectors, and speculators converge, each trade incrementally contributing to the burn pool.
This cumulative effect is amplified by the fact that the burn is executed automatically, removing any human discretion that might otherwise delay or bypass the process.
From a macro‑economic perspective, the deflationary pressure introduced by this steady reduction in supply aligns with classic monetary theories that suggest a shrinking token pool can bolster scarcity‑driven value appreciation, provided demand remains robust.
However, one cannot ignore the counterargument that an overly aggressive burn could disincentivize high‑frequency trading, as participants might perceive the ongoing token loss as an additional cost layer.
In practical terms, this could curtail market depth, leading to wider spreads and a less liquid environment, which in turn might deter newcomers wary of slippage.
Yet, Paintswap appears to have struck a balance, opting for a rate that is low enough to preserve liquidity while still offering a tangible scarcity signal to long‑term holders.
The burn calculator itself serves as a transparent conduit, allowing users to model hypothetical scenarios – for instance, inputting a $10,000 sale against a current supply of 100 million BRUSH illustrates a burn of roughly 125,000 tokens, a figure that is both comprehensible and impactful.
Such tools demystify the tokenomics, empowering participants to make informed decisions rather than navigating a cloud of abstraction.
Moreover, the psychological impact of visible burn events can’t be understated; each recorded reduction in supply reinforces the narrative of a self‑sustaining ecosystem, fostering community confidence.
In my view, the integration of a burn mechanism, coupled with an intuitive calculator, not only enhances transparency but also aligns incentives across the diverse stakeholder spectrum.
Ultimately, the success of BRUSH’s deflationary model will hinge on sustained demand, a vibrant creator base, and the platform’s ability to adapt to market dynamics, but the foundational architecture appears thoughtfully designed to support long‑term token health.
While the preceding exposition is exhaustive, one must remain vigilant against rhetorical excess.
Formality demands brevity, yet the argument presented is sufficiently cogent.
Consequently, the token’s deflationary schema warrants cautious optimism.
Prudence, therefore, should guide any investment deliberations.
Hey folks, the burn thing is pretty neat and could help keep BRUSH valuable.
Let’s give it a shot and see how it plays out.
I think it’s just hype.
It’s encouraging to see transparent tools that let users visualize token dynamics.
Transparency often leads to healthier ecosystems.
Meh, another token with a calculator. Won’t change anything.
Just another gimmick.
From an ethical standpoint, the introduction of a systematic burn aligns with principles of responsible token supply management, reflecting a commitment to scarcity that underpins value.
Nevertheless, the moral imperative extends beyond mere mechanics; the platform must ensure equitable access and resist exploitative practices that manipulate scarcity for profit.
The formal documentation should be scrutinized for any clauses that could subvert community interests, thereby upholding the fiduciary duty owed to token holders.
In sum, while the burn functionality is commendable, it must be situated within a broader governance framework that safeguards fairness.
Honestly, I’m more interested in the drama than the math.
The burn just fuels the conversation.
This whole BRUSH burn thing feels like a marketing ploy to make people feel special.
Sure, it’s technically a burn, but does it really matter in the grand scheme?
Probably not, but hey, it looks cool on the dashboard.
Nice tool, concise and useful.
Oh wow, a burn calculator, how original 😂
Let’s hope the token doesn’t burn itself out before we’re done talking about it.