RAM Token Value Calculator
Current RAM Token Info
Current Price: $0.0162
Total Supply: 200 million
Circulating Supply: 130 million
Market Cap: $5.6 million
Lock Duration Options
- 1 Week +0.5%
- 1 Month +1.0%
- 3 Months +2.0%
- 1 Year +4.0%
- 4 Years +8.0%
Calculate Your Potential Returns
Projected Returns
When you hear Ramses v2 is a decentralized exchange (DEX) that blends concentrated liquidity with the ve(3,3) incentive model, you’re looking at the latest Arbitrum‑native liquidity hub. In this review we break down its tech, tokenomics, and where it stands among the crowded DEX landscape, so you can decide if it belongs in your portfolio.
Quick Takeaways
- Ramses v2 runs on Arbitrum and HyperEVM, offering near‑zero slippage through concentrated liquidity.
- The RAM (native token) sits at $0.0162 and supplies a vote‑escrowed NFT system that rewards long‑term holders.
- Fee distribution is voting‑based, meaning active governance participants earn a larger slice of swap fees.
- Partnerships with Liquity, Yearn, and LayerZero give the protocol solid integration points across DeFi.
- Complexity around ve(3,3) and concentrated liquidity creates a learning curve for newcomers.
How Ramses v2 Works
At its core, Ramses v2 is an automated market maker (AMM) that adopted the concentrated liquidity design pioneered by Uniswap V3. Instead of spreading liquidity across the whole price curve, providers pick a price band where they think most trades will happen. This concentrates capital, boosts fee earnings, and reduces slippage.
The protocol is built on the Arbitrum layer‑2 for fast, cheap transactions, and since June2025 it also runs on HyperEVM, a Hyperliquid‑backed execution environment that lets traders tap into perpetual markets without leaving the DEX.
Ramses v2’s price‑determination function iterates until the marginal price aligns with the pool’s current liquidity distribution, delivering what the developers call “near‑zero slippage.” In practice, large orders often see less price impact than on classic AMMs like Uniswap v2.
Tokenomics & the RAM Token
The native token, RAM (utility and governance token), is minted at a hard cap of 200million. As of 2Oct2025, 130million circulate, giving a market cap of roughly $5.6million. RAM holders can lock tokens to mint vote‑escrowed NFTs (veNFTs) that power the protocol’s ve(3,3) model. The “x(3,3)” iteration aims to simplify the original math while preserving the core idea: the longer you lock, the bigger your voting weight and fee share.
Locked RAM receives three revenue streams:
- Anti‑dilution rebases that increase the locked amount over time.
- A slice of swap fees from the pools you vote to reward.
- Any external incentives (the so‑called “bribes”) projects allocate to boost liquidity for their tokens.
This creates a feedback loop where active governance participants are directly rewarded, unlike platforms that hand out a flat percentage of total fees to all lock‑ups.
Liquidity Management & Fee Model
Liquidity providers (LPs) choose a price range for each pair, much like Uniswap V3. The fee tier is 0.05% for stable‑coin pairs and 0.30% for volatile assets, but the actual earnings each LP receives depend on two signals:
- How much liquidity they supplied within the chosen range.
- Whether the pool received voting‑driven token emissions (the “bribe” mechanism).
Because emissions are allocated by community vote, LPs are incentivised to lock RAM and actively push for rewards on the pools they think will be most profitable. This contrasts with Curve or Balancer, where a blanket share of all protocol fees goes to token‑locking users regardless of the pools they care about.
Multi‑Chain Deployment: Arbitrum & HyperEVM
Running on two chains gives Ramses v2 distinct advantages:
- Arbitrum offers low‑cost, high‑throughput trading for the bulk of DeFi users.
- HyperEVM connects directly to Hyperliquid’s perpetual market, meaning a trader can swap RAM for a perpetual contract without bridging assets.
The cross‑chain bridge is powered by LayerZero and Axelar, ensuring assets move safely between the L2 and HyperEVM ecosystems.
Competition & Comparison
| Feature | Ramses v2 | Uniswap V3 | Velodrome | Camelot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core AMM model | Concentrated liquidity + x(3,3) incentives | Concentrated liquidity only | Concentrated liquidity + ve(3,3) | Concentrated liquidity |
| Primary chain | Arbitrum & HyperEVM | Ethereum L1 & L2s | Arbitrum | Arbitrum |
| Governance token | RAM | UNI | VELO | CAME |
| Fee distribution | Vote‑driven per‑pool emissions | Flat protocol fee share | Vote‑driven + protocol share | Flat protocol fee share |
| Liquidity incentives | Bribes + anti‑dilution rebases | Liquidity mining programs | Liquidity mining + ve(3,3) | Liquidity mining |
| Cross‑chain support | LayerZero & Axelar bridges | Limited (via external bridges) | LayerZero bridge | LayerZero bridge |
Ramses v2’s biggest edge is the voting‑based fee allocation, which pushes LPs to be active community members. Velodrome offers a similar ve(3,3) structure but lacks the HyperEVM integration that opens up derivative trading without extra steps.
Partnerships & Ecosystem Integration
Ramses v2 has locked in collaborations with heavy‑weight DeFi protocols: Liquity, Frax Finance, Yearn, Olympus DAO, and Alchemix. Emerging projects such as Shrapnel DAO, Tarot, Gains Network, and Radiant Capital also route their liquidity through Ramses, giving the DEX a steady flow of new token pairs.
Aggregator ties with 1inch, Paraswap, Odos, and Kyberswap guarantee that traders can reach Ramses pools from virtually any wallet interface. Meanwhile, cross‑chain infrastructure from LayerZero and Axelar means you can move assets from Ethereum, Polygon, or even Solana (via bridging) into the Ramses environment with a few clicks.
Risks & Who Should Use It
Despite the appealing incentives, there are a few caveats:
- Complexity: Understanding ve(3,3), bribes, and price‑range selection requires a learning curve. Newcomers may lock tokens incorrectly and earn less than expected.
- Liquidity concentration risk: If you set a narrow price band and the market moves out of that range, your capital becomes idle until you adjust the position.
- Token volatility: RAM’s price has swung over 40% in short periods, so the value of your voting power can erode quickly.
- Competitive pressure: Uniswap v3, Velodrome, and Camelot are all adding new incentives, which could dilute Ramses’ market share.
Ideal users are DeFi enthusiasts who already hold RAM or plan to lock it, and traders who want tighter spreads on Arbitrum or HyperEVM. Institutional players looking for advanced liquidity management may also benefit from the voting‑based fee model.
Bottom Line
Ramses v2 blends the best of concentrated liquidity with a governance‑centric token model. Its dual‑chain presence gives it a unique foothold in the fast‑growing Arbitrum ecosystem while also tapping into Hyperliquid’s derivative market. If you’re comfortable navigating ve(3,3) mechanics and want to earn fees by actively voting on pool incentives, Ramses v2 is worth a spot in your DeFi toolkit. For those who prefer plug‑and‑play simplicity, traditional AMMs may still feel more approachable.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main advantage of Ramses v2’s fee distribution?
Fees are allocated to the pools that receive community votes, meaning active RAM stakers can steer where the biggest fee streams go. This creates a direct reward for governance participation, unlike flat‑rate fee sharing on many other DEXs.
How do I lock RAM to earn veNFTs?
Visit the Ramses UI, click “Lock RAM,” choose a lock period (minimum 1week, maximum 4years), and confirm the transaction on Arbitrum or HyperEVM. Once locked, you receive a non‑fungible token representing your voting power.
Can I provide liquidity on both Arbitrum and HyperEVM?
Yes. The same Ramses contract is deployed on both chains, and you can add liquidity to the identical pool on each network. Bridging assets between them is handled by LayerZero or Axelar bridges.
Is Ramses v2 safe from hacks?
The core contracts are open‑source and have undergone multiple audits (e.g., by PeckShield and ConsenSys Diligence). Still, any DeFi protocol carries risk, so consider using hardware wallets and only allocate capital you can afford to lose.
How does Ramses v2 compare to Velodrome?
Both use ve(3,3)‑style incentives, but Velodrome runs only on Arbitrum and leans heavily on liquidity mining. Ramses adds HyperEVM access, a tighter integration with Uniswap V3’s concentrated liquidity, and a distinct voting‑driven fee system.
Post Comments (24)
Looks like the RAM token is trying to attract holders with those lock‑up bonuses. The 0.5% weekly bump is modest, but over a year it climbs to 4%, which could be nice for passive investors. Still, the low price means you need a lot of tokens to see meaningful returns.
omg this dEX looks s0 cool 😍 i tried the calc and got like $0.02 profit after a year lol. maybe i should lock my tokens for 4 years 😂
Great potential for small investors
I see the design is pretty simple and the UI looks clean but the real question is liquidity. If the pool stays shallow, those APY numbers might not hold up. Also, think about the risk of smart contract bugs. Overall, a cautious approach seems wise.
They probably hide the real fees somewhere in the code, and the token price is being manipulated. Too many "transparent" projects end up being scams. Keep your eyes open.
Stop whining about low returns and just stake if you want any gains.
The calculator is straightforward: you input your USD amount, select a lock period, and it multiplies by the appropriate bonus. Remember that the market can swing, so treat the projected return as an estimate, not a guarantee.
Another token promising the moon, another disappointment waiting in the shadows.
When we examine the architecture of the RAM token DEX, several layers of consideration emerge that merit a deep dive beyond the surface-level APR figures. First, the tokenomics allocate a relatively modest circulating supply of 130 million against a total of 200 million, which suggests that future unlocks could exert upward pressure on dilution. Second, the lock‑up incentive schedule, ranging from a 0.5 % weekly uplift to an 8 % annualized boost for a four‑year commitment, is architected to reward long‑term confidence but also penalizes flexibility, which may deter traders seeking liquidity. Third, the underlying smart contracts, while audited, still operate within a nascent DeFi ecosystem where code exploits can emerge unexpectedly, and thus risk assessment must factor in both technical and economic vectors. Fourth, the market capitalization of roughly $5.6 million places the token in a micro‑cap category, implying heightened volatility and susceptibility to large‑scale token movements by a handful of whales. Fifth, the fee structure, although not fully disclosed in the UI, typically includes a modest swap fee that is redistributed to liquidity providers, thereby intertwining user returns with the health of the pool. Sixth, user experience is bolstered by an intuitive calculator, yet the accuracy of projected returns hinges on the assumption that the token price remains static-a scenario rarely observed in practice. Seventh, the potential for governance participation offers an additional layer of utility, though the mechanisms for proposal submission and voting power distribution remain opaque at this stage. Eighth, comparing RAM's yield curves to those of established platforms reveals a competitive edge in the longer horizons but a lag in short‑term APY, which may influence where capital is allocated. Ninth, psychological factors, such as FOMO and the allure of “big‑ticket” returns, can drive inflows that temporarily inflate prices, only to be corrected once the novelty wanes. Tenth, the broader macro‑economic environment, including regulatory scrutiny on decentralized exchanges, could impose constraints that affect both token availability and user adoption. Eleventh, liquidity depth is a critical metric; thin order books can lead to slippage that erodes the nominal gains promised by the lock‑up bonuses. Twelfth, the platform’s roadmap mentions upcoming cross‑chain integrations, which, if realized, could expand the user base and improve token velocity. Thirteenth, community sentiment, as gauged through social channels, displays a mix of optimism and skepticism, underscoring the need for diligent personal research. Fourteenth, the token’s price history shows episodes of rapid appreciation followed by sharp declines, a pattern characteristic of nascent assets. Fifteenth, ultimately, the decision to allocate capital to RAM should be guided by a balanced view that weighs potential upside against systemic risk, liquidity constraints, and personal risk tolerance.
Wow, groundbreaking innovation there.
The APR numbers look appealing, but without solid volume the whole thing feels shaky.
Another day, another DEX promising riches while the developers sit in secret rooms, counting their hidden tokens.
To summarize, the lock period multiplier is applied to the principal after converting the USD amount to RAM at the current price of $0.0162. Then the bonus percentage is added to the yield before fees.
Locking for a year could be a solid move if you believe in the project’s long‑term vision.
From a tokenomics perspective, the staking incentive aligns with liquidity provisioning, thereby enhancing the depth‑of‑market and reducing slippage risk.
In the grand tapestry of decentralized finance, each token is a thread, and RAM weaves a pattern that may either shimmer or fray under market winds.
Hey folks 😊 the calculator is a good start but always double‑check the gas fees before committing!
Solid concept but needs more depth
Numbers are inflated; the real return will be far less once market pressure hits.
Honestly, I think the platform has potential if they can keep the code secure and attract more liquidity providers.
This is just another foreign scheme trying to hijack our market, stay clear of it.
looks interesting but i’d watch the volume first
The elegance of a simple staking interface belies the complex economic forces at play, reminding us that simplicity can be both a virtue and a veil.
Totally agree with the point about checking gas fees, and it’s great that the community is looking out for each other. Adding to that, you might also want to compare the effective APR after fees across multiple DEXes to ensure you’re getting the best deal. A quick spreadsheet can help you visualize the net returns over different lock periods. Keep the conversation going and share any screenshots of your calculations, it helps everyone stay informed.